Good Design (the kind that contributes to the betterment of society) vs. Good Design (the awe-inspiring kind that’s extraordinarily attractive and aesthetically pleasing)
By megan dealNovember 8th, 2007
By: Megan Deal
What is Good Design? Aubrey and I started to address this question in an earlier conversation, found here. In typical ichat fashion, we began to pose simple questions while exchanging impromptu ideas, barely scraping the surface of what could have evolved into a complex discussion. Our conversation resulted from the aggravating circumstances we deal with “on the job,” where “good” design boils down to one thing: Sophisticated color palette, elegant well-kerned type, simple-structured modular grid, and plenty of white space. Add some iridescent glitter, send it off the the lasar-cutter and you’ve got yourself one “well-designed” greeting card, good enough to sell for at least $3.95. My intention here is not to discredit my place of employment. (I think I’ve done that enough over the past few weeks) My point is simply that “good” design for some merely implies a style. If it looks “designy,” (or rather like it was born straight out of the Modern era), then it must be good. Plain and simple.
This question of “good” design has led me to think about the role of design in society, what it can be used for, and who can be effected by it. Is good design merely a subjective call on style? Is good design, responsible design? Is it socially conscience? Does it reach a broad audience? Can it make a difference? As developing graphic designers, we’re harnessing talents that can be used to greatly effect the way that people perceive the world. Who we choose to work with and what we choose to do with our skill will depend on the individual. But I would suggest that social responsibility has become an inherent part of design; an issue that cannot be neglected, like it or not.
At this point, I have nothing but questions regarding this complex topic. I’m interested in sharing some ideas with one another, and developing the issue further. I’m anxious to learn where others stand on this topic, and how, if at all, you see social responsibility shaping your role as a young designer…
Take a look at today’s main image on foxnews.com:
Is it good, responsible design? Is it socially conscious? Does it reach a broad audience? Can it make a difference?
I swear this is lifted directly from Fox’s site, I couldn’t even make this stuff up. If you look closely, this pic was taken at Wal-Mart, not even a mall, which makes it that much more hilarious to me. But I digress.
I would counter with this:
Better design, but not exactly popular.
All kidding aside, take a look at what incredible design can be made out of some actual statistics. Take some time to watch this whole thing, it is really amazing, and think about our role as presenters of information.
Ok, my above links don’t show, and I can’t seem to edit that last comment, so copy and paste the following:
FOX LINK:
http://www.foxnews.com/images/root_images/110807_mall_terror.jpg
THE OTHER LINK:
http://logo.cafepress.com/7/74.73997.jpg
THE HANS ROSLING TALK:
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/92
Seriously, check out the Rosling lecture.
Ok, the above will all make sense once it gets moderated. Patience.
Just found this today!
http://www.typotheque.com/articles/how_good_is_good/